Skip to content

gh-136669: build _asyncio as static module #136670

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 16, 2025

Conversation

kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 commented Jul 15, 2025

Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better to keep _asyncio in Setup.stdlib.in, it isn't really in the same category as boostrap.in. You could instead add the *static* directive in a new section at the end of the file, see e.g. the current *shared* directive on line 187. Would this work?

A

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it would be better to keep _asyncio in Setup.stdlib.in, it isn't really in the same category as boostrap.in. You could instead add the static directive in a new section at the end of the file, see e.g. the current shared directive on line 187. Would this work?

Yes, that worked, I have changed it now. Thanks

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2025 16:38
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Jul 15, 2025
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @kumaraditya303 for commit 87ff8fc 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F136670%2Fmerge

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Jul 15, 2025
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 requested a review from pablogsal July 16, 2025 10:32
@kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like there is some network issue on ubuntu bots.

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor Author

The CI is fixed now and tested locally on macOS:

sudo ./python.exe -m test test_external_inspection -v
== CPython 3.15.0a0 (heads/asyncio-perf:424b6568065, Jul 16 2025, 16:43:27) [Clang 17.0.0 (clang-1700.0.13.5)]
== macOS-15.5-arm64-arm-64bit-Mach-O little-endian
== Python build: debug
== cwd: /Users/kumaraditya/work/cpython/build/test_python_worker_92525æ
== CPU count: 10
== encodings: locale=UTF-8 FS=utf-8
== resources: all test resources are disabled, use -u option to unskip tests

Using random seed: 1579711546
0:00:00 load avg: 8.90 Run 1 test sequentially in a single process
0:00:00 load avg: 8.90 [1/1] test_external_inspection
test_async_gather_remote_stack_trace (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_async_gather_remote_stack_trace) ... ok
test_async_global_awaited_by (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_async_global_awaited_by) ... ok
test_async_remote_stack_trace (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_async_remote_stack_trace) ... ok
test_async_staggered_race_remote_stack_trace (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_async_staggered_race_remote_stack_trace) ... ok
test_asyncgen_remote_stack_trace (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_asyncgen_remote_stack_trace) ... ok
test_only_active_thread (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_only_active_thread) ... ok
test_remote_stack_trace (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_remote_stack_trace) ... ok
test_self_trace (test.test_external_inspection.TestGetStackTrace.test_self_trace) ... ok
test_unsupported_platform_error (test.test_external_inspection.TestUnsupportedPlatformHandling.test_unsupported_platform_error) ... skipped 'Test only runs on unsupported platforms (not Linux, macOS, or Windows)'

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 9 tests in 0.546s

OK (skipped=1)
0:00:00 load avg: 8.90 [1/1] test_external_inspection passed

== Tests result: SUCCESS ==

1 test OK.

Total duration: 594 ms
Total tests: run=9 skipped=1
Total test files: run=1/1
Result: SUCCESS

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 linked an issue Jul 16, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 merged commit b7d7225 into python:main Jul 16, 2025
92 of 113 checks passed
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 deleted the asyncio-perf branch July 16, 2025 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

build _asyncio module as static module
4 participants