Skip to content

[dlc.init.general] Fix wording of direct-initialization #6450

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 3 additions & 5 deletions source/declarations.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4581,17 +4581,15 @@
\end{note}

\pnum
The initialization that occurs
Initialization is called \defn{direct-initialization} if it occurs
\begin{itemize}
\item for an \grammarterm{initializer} that is a
parenthesized \grammarterm{expression-list} or a \grammarterm{braced-init-list},
\item for a \grammarterm{new-initializer}\iref{expr.new},
\item in a \keyword{static_cast} expression\iref{expr.static.cast},
\item in a functional notation type conversion\iref{expr.type.conv}, and
\item in the \grammarterm{braced-init-list} form of a \grammarterm{condition}
\item in a functional notation type conversion\iref{expr.type.conv}, or
\item in the \grammarterm{braced-init-list} form of a \grammarterm{condition}.
\end{itemize}
is called
\defn{direct-initialization}.

\pnum
The semantics of initializers are as follows.
Expand Down