Skip to content

docs: clarify workspace scheduling priority and autostop requirement behavior #18447

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

blink-so[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@blink-so blink-so bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Closing this Blink-generated PR as it has been open for 25 days with minimal review activity. The documentation improvements can be re-implemented if needed.

…behavior

- Add priority section to template schedule docs explaining how autostop requirements take precedence over user settings
- Add note to user guide about autostop requirement overrides
- Add FAQ section addressing common scheduling confusion
- Include specific scenarios showing when requirements vs user settings apply

Fixes confusion around when workspaces shut down when both template autostop requirements and user autostop settings are configured.

Co-authored-by: matifali <10648092+matifali@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

blink-so bot commented Jun 19, 2025

@stirby Could you please review this PR? This addresses the scheduling priority confusion that was discussed in Slack, specifically clarifying how autostop requirements interact with user-configured autostop settings.

The documentation now clearly explains that:

  • Autostop requirements always take precedence over user settings
  • Users can set shorter durations but cannot exceed the requirement
  • The earliest deadline wins

This should help reduce customer confusion about when workspaces will actually shut down.

blink-so bot and others added 2 commits June 19, 2025 09:24
Fixes lint failure by removing trailing whitespace that was causing the CI check to fail.

Co-authored-by: matifali <10648092+matifali@users.noreply.github.com>
The markdown linter expects blank lines after scenario headings before list items.
This fixes the CI lint failure by conforming to the expected markdown format.

Co-authored-by: matifali <10648092+matifali@users.noreply.github.com>
@matifali matifali self-assigned this Jun 19, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale This issue is like stale bread. label Jun 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jul 1, 2025
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert reopened this Jul 1, 2025
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert added docs Area: coder.com/docs and removed stale This issue is like stale bread. labels Jul 1, 2025
@EdwardAngert
Copy link
Contributor

@matifali I reopened this, but it's likely not going to get attention until next week

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale This issue is like stale bread. label Jul 9, 2025
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert removed the stale This issue is like stale bread. label Jul 9, 2025
@blink-so blink-so bot closed this Jul 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 14, 2025
@EdwardAngert EdwardAngert reopened this Jul 15, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
docs Area: coder.com/docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants