The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service
Should the wives of peers/knights who are entitled to appropriate stylings (eg. The Lady Cryer for Ellie Reeves; Lady Nugee for Emily Thornberry; etc), but who do not use them, be referred to as:
Option A. Use the full/official/legal title in both the lede sentence and the infobox (ex. Ellie Claire Reeves, Baroness/Lady Cryer and The Lady Cryer in the lede and infobox, respectively); Option B. Do not use the full/official/legal title in both the lede and the infobox (ex.Ellie Claire Reeves and Ellie Reeves, in the lede and infobox, respectively), but include a note (ex. Reeves is entitled to be styled as Lady Cryer by marriage; or something of the sort); Option C. As a compromise, use the full title in the lede but not the infobox (ex. Ellie Claire Reeves, Baroness/Lady Cryer in the lede, but Ellie Reeves in the infobox); possibly including a note here as well.
The prior RfC ended in "no consensus" when the suspect was a minor and uncharged. He is now eighteen and was indicted for first-degree murder. Should their name be included in the article?
How should J.K. Rowling and her views on transgender issues be described in the article? (You may rank in order of preference.) 22:42, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Savarkar's description currently calls him a "politician, activist, and writer". Should ideologue be included there? EarthDude (talk) 04:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
"Previously charged with shoplifting, Barrett also has been before the courts for directing threatening language against members of An Garda Síochána, for public order offences outside a hospital, and for driving without a driving licence or car insurance."
Should we change the title to "interim president" or keep it as "President of Syria"? Most sources refer to him as 'Interim' [1], [2], [3],[4], [5], [6], [7], [8] while others use 'President' [9],[10],[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]
Should the infobox photograph be changed from the current 1959 portrait to something else? Note that the other three images below are purely illustrative and not part of the proposal. Cremastra (talk) 20:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
_reading_a_book%2C_painted_circa_1605-1615_in_India_(British_Museum_1921%2C1011%2C0.3)_Cropped.jpg){kind=link}
_Babur_detail.jpg){kind=link}