Skip to main content

Oligarchs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Economic Decline of the West

Abstract

After describing who the oligarchs are and how they expand and consolidate their power and influence, this chapter studies how the oligarchy in the West stifles innovation, undermines democratic processes, hinders responses to climate change, and contributes to militarization and conflict. This chapter identifies powerful oligarchies in the oil industry (Big Oil), in finance (The Bankers), in industrial agriculture (The Food Barons), tech industry (The Technofeudalists), and mainstream media (The Media Moguls). It discusses the role of oligarchs in the 2008 financial crisis, the increasingly fragile global food system, and the digital economy. This prepares the reader for a deeper analysis of the role of oligarchs in the oil industry (Big Oil) and in the military and defence industry (The Gun Merchants), which follows in subsequent chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Mongolia)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 96.29
Price includes VAT (Mongolia)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 119.99
Price excludes VAT (Mongolia)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0100_EN.html

  2. 2.

    A cotton gin is a tool that separates the seeds from cotton fibres. It is often states that this was invented by Eli Whitney in 1793/94 and subsequently revolutionized the cotton industry in the US—and contributed to the expansion of slavery in the South (McMichael, 1991; Oakes, 2016). Lakwete (2003) however argues that Whitney did not invent the cotton gin, but that it was invented centuries before in Asia and Africa.

  3. 3.

    See: http://www.economist.com/node/13216025

  4. 4.

    See http://normanmacrae.ning.com/forum/topics/entrepreneurial-revolution

  5. 5.

    Permissionless innovation “means that experimentation with new technologies and business models should generally be permitted by default. Unless a compelling case can be made that a new invention will bring serious harm to society, innovation should be allowed to continue unabated and problems, if they develop at all, can be addressed later” (Thierer, 2016: 3).

  6. 6.

    Baily (2003: 6) summarized and discussed the findings of an OECD research project into the sources of economic growth in the OECD, pointing out that “R&D activities by the business sector had high social returns, and hence contributed to growth, but there was no evidence in this analysis of positive effects from government R&D.” Similarly, Sveikauskas (2007: 1) reported that “the overall rate of return to R&D is very large, perhaps 25 percent as a private return and a total of 65 percent for social returns. However, these returns apply only to privately financed R&D in industry. Returns to many forms of publicly financed R&D are near zero.”

  7. 7.

    There is a growing literature dealing with the question whether government R&D crowds in, or crowds-out, private R&D—see, for example, Becker (2015) and Görg and Strobl (2007). The literature is largely inconclusive, and neglects the question whether, even where crowding-in may occur, as in the defense industry, whether this crowding-in is distortive.

  8. 8.

    See: https://allianceforscience.org/blog/2024/02/give-genes-a-chance-over-1000-scientists-in-14-countries-hold-historic-demonstrations-in-support-of-gene-editing/

  9. 9.

    See: https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2024/01/22/viewpoint-nobel-laureates-and-1000-other-scientists-plead-with-european-parliamentarians-to-reject-the-darkness-of-anti-science-fearmongering-over-gene-editing/

  10. 10.

    Zombie firms are old firms with “persistent problems meeting their interest payments, on the edge of exiting but remaining in business” (McGowan et al., 2017: 3).

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2011). Why nations fail. The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akcigit, U., & Ates, S. (2019a). Ten facts on declining business dynamism and lessons from endogenous growth theory. In CEPR Discussion Paper no. 13668. Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akcigit, U., & Ates, S. (2019b). What happened to U.S. business dynamics? CEPR Discussion Paper no. 13669. Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C., & Gal, P. (2016). The best versus the rest: The global productivity slowdown, divergence across firms and the role of public policy. In OECD Productivity Working Papers no. 5. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, E. (2020, January 29). The intellectual and moral decline in academic research. James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., Fuchs, E., Goldstein, A., & Kearney, M. (2018). Funding breakthrough research: Promises and challenges of the ARPA model. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 19, 69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baily, M. (2003). The source of economic growth in OECD countries: A review article. International Productivity Monitor, 7, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (2024, January 2). American oligarchy: The fight for democracy is just the first step. Salon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. R. (2008, June 25). US subprime mortgage meltdown. Paper presented at the 14th Dubrovnik Economic Conference. Dubrovnik Available at www.hnb.hr/dub-konf/14-konferencija/barth.ppt

  • Baumol, W. J., & Strom, R. J. (2007). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29, 917–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessen, J., Denk, E., Kim, J., & Righi, C. (2020). Declining industrial disruption. Boston University Law School Working Paper.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, M. (2021). Human frontiers: The future of big ideas in an age of small thinking. The Bridge Street Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, G. (2024, May 2). How today’s American Capitalism undermines democracy. Next Big Idea Club Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020). Are ideas getting harder to find? American Economic Review, 110(4), 1104–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., van Reenen, J., & Williams, H. (2019). A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonatti, L. (2023). The epistemic vices of democracies in the age of populism. CESifo Working Paper 10569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bufacchi, V. (2021). Truth, lies and tweets: A consensus theory of post-truth. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(3), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, C. (2024, February 23). We landed on the moon again. The Morning Brew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caverley, Z.R. (2023, November 4). Who should fund science? Quillette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. L. (2015a). Fallen behind: Science, technology and Soviet Statism. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 8(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. (2015b). The end of the American century: US hegemony and the rise of East Asia. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancel, L. (2022). Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019. Nature Sustainability, 5, 931–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2021). Global income inequality, 1820-2020: The persistence and mutation of extreme inequality. HAL Id. halshs-03321887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, D. (2009, August 28). Banks too big to fail have grown even bigger. The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2017). Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 principles of concentration of wealth and power. Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., Flannery, H., Fitzgerald, J., Ocampo, O., Paslaski, S., & Thomhave, K. (2021). Silver Spoon Oligarchs: How America’s 50 Largest Inherited-Wealth Dynasties Accelerate Inequality. IPS report, 16 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covarrubias, M., Gutierrez, G., & Philippon, T. (2019). From good to bad concentration? U.S. industries over the past 30 years. NBER Working Paper no. 25983, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. (2010). The great stagnation: How America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. : Penguin (Dutton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouzet, N., & Eberly, J. (2018). Understanding weak capital investment: The role of market concentration and intangibles. Technical Report, Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, August 23–25, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M. (2024, February 9). Gaza shows Britain is an oligarchy: Let’s stop pretending it isn’t. Declassified UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnitzki, D., & Thorwarth, S. (2012). Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries. Research Policy, 41(9), 1555–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship in U.S. job creation and dynamics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2017). Declining dynamism, allocative efficiency, and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 107(5), 322–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. (2007). Sputnik: The Shock of the Century. New York: Walker Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial. (2019, July 10). Cancer, climate, plastics: why ‘earthshots’ are harder than moonshots. Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger, J., Ernsthausen, J., & Kiel, P. (2021, June 8). The secret IRS files: Trove of never-before-seen records reveal how the wealthiest avoid income tax. ProPublica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, B. (2009). Bad rules produce bad outcomes: Underlying public-policy causes of the U.S. financial crisis. Cato Journal, 29(1), 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erixon, F., & Weigl, B. (2016). The innovation illusion. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, D. (2023). American oil-igarchy: How the corporate assault on liberal democracy and the climate are connected. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 34(3), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner, J., Heemskerk, E., & Garcia-Bernardo, G. (2017, May 10). These three firms own corporate America. The Conversation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J., & Forbath, W. E. (2024). Anti-oligarchy constitution reconstructing the economic foundations of american democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formisano, R. P. (2015). Plutocracy in America: How increasing inequality destroys the middle class and exploits the poor. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., & McChesney, R. (2014). Surveillance capitalism: Monopoly finance capital, the military-industrial complex, and the digital age. Monthly Review, 66(3), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J., & Smith, G. (2022, October 4). The hyper-specialization of university researchers. Mind Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. (1990). Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 586–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewin, V. (2023, November 6). How five researchers fared after their ‘great resignation’ from academia. Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. (2021, January 19). Lessons from the Moonshot for fixing global problems, Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschlag, N., & Tabarrok, A. (2018). Is regulation to blame for the decline in American entrepreneurship? Economic Policy, 33(93), 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. (2022). Davos man: How the billionaires devoured the world. Custom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2007). The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74(294), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D. (2024, September 27). How wealth reduces compassion. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gries, T., & Naudé, W. (2011). Entrepreneurship, structural change and a global economic crisis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(3), article 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grullon, G., Larkin, Y., & Michaely, R. (2019). Are U.S. industries becoming more concentrated? Review of Finance, 23(4), 697–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, G., & Philippon, T. (2020). Some facts about dominant firms. NBER Working Paper No. 27985. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltiwanger, J. (2022). Entrepreneurship in the twenty-first century. Small Business Economics, 58, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. (2024a, February 12). Our tenured civ. Overcoming Bias Blog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harford, T. (2006). The undercover economist. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, B. (2024). The broligarchs are trying to have their way: The antidemocratic politics of having it all. The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T. (2021). The hidden history of American oligarchy: Reclaiming our democracy from the ruling class. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T. (2023). The American oligarchs have arrived to destroy US democracy. Common Dreams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T. (2024). The Hidden History of the American Dream: The Demise of the Middle Class—and How to Rescue Our Future. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, F. (2022, August 23). Record profits for grain firms amid food crisis prompt calls for windfall tax. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt, R. A., & Beyeler, N. (2020). Cancer and climate change. The Lancet Oncology, 21, e519–e527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotez, P. J. (2020). Combating antiscience: Are we preparing for the 2020s? PLoS Biology, 18(3), e3000683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotez, P. J. (2021, March 29). The antiscience movement is escalating, going global and killing thousands. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. W. (1895). The American plutocracy. Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (2024, October 20). Britain’s wealth gap is growing. Its malign effects seep into all aspects of life. It’s a national disaster. The Observer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (2023, November 31). Britain is stuck in a doom loop: the system is rigged against growth. That needs to change. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. (2024, May 3). ‘Absurd!’: US billionaires pay lower tax rate than working class for first time. Common Dreams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2009, May). The quiet coup. The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Kwak, J. (2011). 13 bankers: The Wall Street takeover and the next financial meltdown. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, C. (2023). What Dystopia looks like. Peace & Planet News, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. L. (2020, June 1). An ‘excess of democracy’: How corporations killed the campus. Independent Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamepalli, S. K., Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (2020). Kill zone. BER Working Paper No. 27146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karahan, F., Pugsley, B., & Şahin, A. (2019). Demographic origins of the startup deficit (no. 888). Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, M. (2008). Who could have predicted revolution in Iceland? HuffPost Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüppel, L., & Knott, A. (2023). Are ideas being fished out? Research Policy, 52(2), 104665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. (2021, July 6). American oligarchs: Report details how the wealthiest US dynasties hoard their fortunes - And accelerate inequality. International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (2013). Dynamism, rivalry, and the surplus economy: Two essays on the nature of capitalism. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kozeniauskas, N. (2018). Whats Driving the Decline in Entrepreneurship?. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhner, T. K. (2015). American plutocracy. King's Law Journal, 26(1), 44–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. Y., Ma, Y., & Zimmermann, K. (2024). 100 years of rising corporate concentration. American Economic Review, 114(7), 2111–2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakwete, A. (2003). Inventing the cotton gin: Machine and myth in Antebellum America. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, G. (2009). Measuring the Returns of R&D: An Empirical Study of the German Manufacturing Sector over 45 Years. Research Policy, 38(9), 1438–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M. (2021, October 19). A data sleuth challenged a powerful COVID scientist. Then he came after her. Buzzfeed News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenderink, B., Johannes, I., & Voordijk, H. (2019). Innovation and public procurement: From fragmentation to synthesis on concepts, rationales and approaches. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35, 650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. (2024, June 24). Pillaging by the super-rich will continue until the working class revolts. Common Dreams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y. (2008). The impact of the financial crisis on developing countries. Paper presented at the Korea Development Institute, 31 October, Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynas, M. (2024, January 24). Viewpoint: Nobel laureates and 1,000 other scientists plead with European parliamentarians to ‘reject the darkness of anti-science fearmongering’ over gene editing. Genetic Literacy Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. (2022). Can America escape plutocracy? In The Asian 21st century. China and globalization. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainela, T., Puhakka, V., & Sipola, S. (2018). International entrepreneurship beyond individuals and firms: On the systemic nature of international opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 534–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, S., & Charnysh, V. (2017). The flexible few: Oligarchs and wealth defense in developing democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 50(12), 1632–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (2008, October 19). Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires. The Telegraph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy: A moonshot guide to changing capitalism. Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, M., Andrews, D., & Millot, V. (2017). The walking dead? Zombie firms and productivity performance in OECD countries. Working Paper no. 1372. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKie, R. (2024, February 3). The situation has become appalling’: Fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (1991). Slavery in capitalism: The rise and demise of the U. S. Ante-Bellum cotton culture. Theory and Society, 20(3), 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meaker, M. (2023, September 5). Welcome to the age of Technofeudalism. WIRED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, M. (2021, April 4). Does wealth rob the brain of compassion? The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., Naudé, W., & Stam, E. (2023). Is productive entrepreneurship getting scarcer? A reflection on the contemporary relevance of Baumol’s typology, IZA DP No. 16408. IZA Institute for Labor Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2022a, May 19). The banks collapsed in 2008 and our foodsystem is about to do the same. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2022b, October 30). The oligarch’s oligarch. https://www.monbiot.com/2022/10/30/the-oligarchs-oligarch/

  • Monbiot, G. (2024, June 27). Things are not going to get better as long as oligarchs rule the roost in our democracies. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G., & Hutchison, P. (2024). Invisible doctrine: The secret history of neoliberalism. Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S., & Burch, D. (2012). Cereal secrets: The world’s largest grain traders and global agriculture (Oxfam Research Reports). Oxfam GB for Oxfam International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W., & Nagler, P. (2022). The ossified economy: The case of Germany, 1870–2020, IZA DP No. 15607. IZA Institute of Labor Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. (2016). Is European entrepreneurship in crisis? IZA DP No. 9817. IZA Institute for Labor Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. (2022a). From the entrepreneurial to the ossified economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 46(1), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. (2022b, November 21). “Longtermism” and AI: How our billionaire overlords want to live forever. Medium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. (2023b). Destructive digital entrepreneurship. IZA DP No. 16483. IZA Institute of Labor Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. (2023a). Economic growth and societal collapse: Beyond green growth and degrowth fairy tales. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. (2023c). Late industrialisation and global value chains under platform capitalism. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 50, 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, B.S. (2020). Oligarchs of mainstream mass media in service of capitalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. (2022, September 29). It’s official: America is an oligarchy. The Nation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowogrodzki, A. (2022, September 21). Most US professors are trained at same few elite universities. Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (2016). Capitalism and slavery and the civil war. International Labor and Working-Class History, 89, 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Orive, A., & Timmer, Y. (2023, June 23). Distressed firms and the large effects of monetary policy tightenings. FEDS Notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp-Muller, A., Lee, S. W. S., & Petty, R. E. (2022). Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it? PNAS, 119(30), e2120755119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluckrose, H. (2017, March 27). How French “intellectuals” ruined the west: Postmodernism and its impact, explained. Langaa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammer, C., & Schubert, T. (2018). Concentration on the few: Mechanisms behind a falling share of innovative firms in Germany. Research Policy, 47(2), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (2020). How innovation works. 4th Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy, 19, 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushkoff, D. (2022a, January 9). Silicon Valley’s elite prize data over reality, and it’s hurting us all. Fast Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushkoff, D. (2022b, November 28). What’s a meta for? Part two. Medium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushkoff, D. (2023). Survival of the richest: Escape fantasies of the tech billionaires. W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D. (2018, October 23). America’s plutocrats are winning, Project Syndicate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, I. (2024, January 12). Why landing on the moon is proving more difficult today than 50 years ago. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIC. (2010). Report of the Special Investigation Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense. Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2015, September 12). Why the us could soon be the worlds first former middle class society. Huff Post Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). The anatomy of a murder: Who killed America’s economy? Critical Review, 21(2–3), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokstad, E. (2024, February 7). European Parliament votes to ease regulation of gene-edited crops. Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. W. (1995). Satellites and commissars: Strategy and conflict in the politics of soviet-bloc trade. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Supran, G., & Oreskes, N. (2021). Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate change communications. One Earth, 4(5), 696–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveikauskas, L. (2007). R&D and productivity growth: A review of the literature. Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper 408. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taibbi, M. (2009, April 2). How Wall Street is using the bailout to stage a revolution. Rolling Stone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2024, September 10). Rich countries silencing climate protest while preaching about rights elsewhere, says study. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenreyro, S. (2018, January 15). The fall in productivity growth: causes and implications. Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, A. (2016). Permissionless innovation and public policy: A 10-point blueprint. Mercatus Centre, George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (2021). Digital dystopia. American Economic Review, 111(6), 2007–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tory, M. (2023). Britain PLC in liquidation, 2006-? ONDRA. Available at: https://www.ondra.com/assets/pdfs/Britainplc_131023.pdf

  • Türk, V. (2023, November 1). Protect the ‘right to science’ for people and the planet. Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noorden, R. (2023, November 6). How big is science’s fake-paper problem? Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis, Y. (2023). Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis, Y. (2024a). The EU is becoming an authoritarian superstate. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/european-union-becoming-authoritarian-by-yanis-varoufakis-2024-03

  • Varoufakis, Y. (2024b, January 3). What is the point of NATO? DiEM25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J. A., & Page, B. I. (2009). Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics, 7(04), 731–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J., Aparicio, J., Ortiz, L., Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2021). The productivity of national innovation systems in Europe: Catching up or falling behind? Technovation, 102, 102215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucman, G. (2024, May 3). It’s time to tax the billionaires. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim Naudé .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Naudé, W. (2025). Oligarchs. In: The Economic Decline of the West. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82299-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82299-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-82298-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-82299-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics