feat:Update OpenAPI specifications in src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml file #83
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1)
295-300: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The addition of the
response_idfield is well-structured and consistent with the existingidfield.Consider slightly modifying the description to differentiate it from the
idfield:- description: Unique identifier for the response. + description: Unique identifier for the entire response, distinct from the individual reply id.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.NonStreamedChatResponse.g.csis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1)
295-300: Request for additional contextThe changes look good and are consistent. However, it would be helpful to understand the broader context of these changes.
Could you provide more information about:
- The purpose of adding the
response_idfield?- Are there any other related changes in the file that we should be aware of?
- Does this change affect any existing API consumers?
This context will help ensure that the changes align with the overall API design and don't introduce any breaking changes.
Also applies to: 9591-9596
| response_id: | ||
| type: string | ||
| description: Unique identifier for the response. | ||
| format: uuid | ||
| x-fern-audiences: | ||
| - public |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent structure for response_id field.
Found differing key orders for response_id in the following locations:
- src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml:295-299
- src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml:9591-9596
Please standardize the structure of the response_id field across the file for consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistency across the file.
The addition of the response_id field here is consistent with the earlier change.
To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check if all occurrences of response_id in the file have the same structure:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in the response_id field structure throughout the file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of response_id field across the file
# Test: Search for all occurrences of response_id and its structure
rg -A 5 'response_id:' src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml
Length of output: 428
Summary by CodeRabbit