Skip to content

feat:Update OpenAPI spec: Restructure delta property for tool-related events #135

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Jan 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • API Changes
    • Updated OpenAPI specification for event schemas
    • Restructured delta property in chat tool call events
    • Consolidated tool call and tool plan properties under a new message object

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the OpenAPI specification for Cohere's event schemas, specifically restructuring the delta property in several event types. The changes involve consolidating tool_plan and tool_call properties under a new message object within the delta structure. This reorganization affects ChatToolCallStartEvent and ChatToolCallDeltaEvent, creating a more unified representation of tool-related event data.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml - Restructured delta property in ChatToolCallStartEvent and ChatToolCallDeltaEvent
- Introduced message object containing tool_plan and tool_calls
- Nested tool_call properties under new message structure

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Cohere API
    
    Client->>Cohere API: Request with tool calls
    Cohere API-->>Client: Streamed events
    Note over Cohere API: Event structure updated
    Cohere API->>Client: Events with new `message` object
    Note right of Client: Receives consolidated tool call data
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Structured Grace 🔧

In YAML's realm, a change takes flight,
Tool calls now nestled, oh so tight!
Message object, a cozy home,
Where plans and calls no more shall roam.
Clarity dances, structure's delight! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge January 3, 2025 18:26
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Update OpenAPI spec: Restructure delta property for tool-related events Jan 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit cbd5d77 into main Jan 3, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (3)

12483-12487: LGTM! Consider updating documentation.

The restructuring of tool_calls under message maintains schema consistency and follows the same pattern as other events.

Consider adding a code comment or updating the documentation to explain the relationship between message.tool_calls and ToolCallV2 schema.


12499-12509: Consider type enhancement for function.arguments.

While the structure is logically organized, the arguments field being a string type suggests it might contain JSON-encoded data. Consider whether a more specific schema would be beneficial.

If arguments contains structured data, consider:

  1. Using a specific schema type instead of string
  2. Adding a format hint (e.g., format: json) if it must remain as string
  3. Adding an example in the schema to show the expected format
                            arguments:
                              type: string
+                             description: JSON-encoded function arguments
+                             example: '{"param1": "value1", "param2": 42}'

Line range hint 12467-12509: Architectural improvement in event schema organization.

The restructuring of events to use a consistent message-based structure is a good architectural decision that:

  1. Provides a unified pattern across different event types
  2. Maintains clear separation of concerns
  3. Allows for future extensibility under the message object

Consider documenting this pattern in the API documentation to help consumers understand the event structure consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea46d04 and bd4b6e7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (19)
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallDeltaEventVariant2Delta.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessage.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessage.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessageToolCalls.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessageToolCalls.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessageToolCallsFunction.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessageToolCallsFunction.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallStartEventVariant2Delta.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallStartEventVariant2DeltaMessage.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallStartEventVariant2DeltaMessage.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallStartEventVariant2DeltaToolCall.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolCallStartEventVariant2DeltaToolCallType.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolPlanDeltaEventVariant2Delta.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolPlanDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessage.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatToolPlanDeltaEventVariant2DeltaMessage.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonConverters.ChatToolCallStartEventVariant2DeltaToolCallType.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonConverters.ChatToolCallStartEventVariant2DeltaToolCallTypeNullable.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonSerializerContext.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1)

12467-12471: LGTM! Verify client compatibility with the new structure.

The restructuring of tool_plan under a message object provides better organization while maintaining the same data type.

Run this script to check for existing client implementations that might need updates:

✅ Verification successful

Restructuring of tool_plan is safe to proceed

Based on the codebase analysis, the change to nest tool_plan under a message object is safe. The search revealed that:

  1. The generated C# client code already handles tool plan data through strongly-typed models
  2. The tool plan functionality is properly encapsulated in event-specific classes like ChatToolPlanDeltaEvent and ChatToolPlanDeltaEventVariant2
  3. No direct string access patterns to delta.tool_plan were found in the codebase

The change maintains backward compatibility since:

  • The data type remains a string
  • The client code uses proper serialization/deserialization through generated models
  • The restructuring is consistent with other event types in the API
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for direct references to delta.tool_plan that need updating
rg -l "delta.*tool_plan" --type cs --type ts --type js

Length of output: 56


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for tool_plan usage and delta references
rg "tool_plan|delta" --type ts --type js --type cs -C 2

# Also search for any Cohere client implementations
fd -e ts -e js -e cs -e tsx -e jsx --exec grep -l "Cohere"

Length of output: 65693

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant