Skip to content

Fix missing dot in grpc service host validation in the schema. #1112

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2025

Conversation

adi2412
Copy link
Contributor

@adi2412 adi2412 commented Jul 15, 2025

Please specify parts of this PR update:

  • Specification
  • Schema
  • Examples
  • Extensions
  • Use Cases
  • Community
  • CTK
  • Other

Discussion or Issue link:
#1111

What this PR does:
This PR addresses the issue by allowing dots(.) in the service host. I've also fixed a typo in the title WithGRPCServicePost

Additional information:

Copy link
Member

@ricardozanini ricardozanini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Can you please sign your commit?

Copy link
Member

@cdavernas cdavernas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, cheers ❤️

However, as requested by @ricardozanini, could you sign off your commits?

adi2412 added 2 commits July 16, 2025 09:56
Signed-off-by: Aditya Raisinghani <aditya.ajeet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Raisinghani <aditya.ajeet@gmail.com>
@adi2412 adi2412 force-pushed the fix/grpc-host-schema branch from 3013b4b to 788cc1c Compare July 16, 2025 04:27
@adi2412
Copy link
Contributor Author

adi2412 commented Jul 16, 2025

Done

Copy link
Member

@cdavernas cdavernas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Cheers ❤️

@cdavernas cdavernas merged commit 5b815ad into serverlessworkflow:main Jul 16, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants