Skip to content

Edit error marker comments on some tests #2048

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yangdanny97
Copy link
Contributor

See inline comments for why

@@ -23,8 +23,13 @@ class Color(Enum):
# > constructor. Instead, the call performs a value-based lookup of an
# > enum member.

assert_type(Color["RED"], Color) # 'Literal[Color.RED]' is also acceptable
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

felt odd to assert_type here and say that another type is also acceptable. I tried to put both versions down, so that type checkers have discretion on which one to implement w/o the test failing.

I assume that if a checker emits an error on both lines the test will fail - could the maintainers please confirm this assumption?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's right; this is documented in the "Test case syntax" section in conformance/README.

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ def method3() -> None: # E[method3]
pass

@overload # E[method4]
def method4(self, x: int) -> int:
def method4(self, x: int) -> int: # E[method4]
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yangdanny97 yangdanny97 Jul 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pyrefly emits diagnostics on the line of the def, not the line with the @overload

This is similar to what I did in #1980

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants