-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.4k
Open
Labels
interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)topic-JITtype-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement
Description
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
We have a tail calling interpreter. I now propose to tightly couple that with the JIT, so we can tail call into the JIT and tail call out of it.
This has a few benefits:
- No more C stack consumption by the JIT.
- Much more efficient entry and exit of jitted code. OSR entry is just a single indirect jump.
We need to align the calling convention of the JIT and the tail calling interpreter. This will need careful benchmarking to make sure we don't regress JIT performance.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
No response given
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)topic-JITtype-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement