You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@@ -85,33 +87,42 @@ The following steps initiate a pull request to add a tiny and somewhat flawed Py
85
87
86
88
Use your usual Git workflow to perform the following steps in the `coderabbit-test` repository:
87
89
88
-
1. Create a branch named `add-utils`.
89
-
90
-
1. In that new `add-utils` branch, create a new file called `simple_utils.py`, with the following content:
91
-
92
-
```python
93
-
# simple_utils.py - A tiny utility library
90
+
<ListItems
91
+
orderedList
92
+
items={[
93
+
"Create a branch named `add-utils`.",
94
+
<>
95
+
In that new <code>add-utils</code> branch, create a new file called <code>simple_utils.py</code>, with the following content:
96
+
<CodeBlocklanguage="python">{`
97
+
# simple_utils.py - A tiny utility library
94
98
95
-
defreverse_string(text):
96
-
"""Reverses the characters in a string."""
97
-
return text[::-1]
99
+
def reverse_string(text):
100
+
"""Reverses the characters in a string."""
101
+
return text[::-1]
98
102
99
-
defcount_words(sentence):
100
-
returnlen(sentence.split())
103
+
def count_words(sentence):
104
+
return len(sentence.split())
101
105
102
-
defcelsius_to_fahrenheit(celsius):
103
-
return (celsius *9/5) +32
104
-
```
106
+
def celsius_to_fahrenheit(celsius):
107
+
return (celsius \* 9/5) + 32
108
+
`}</CodeBlock>
109
+
</>,
110
+
"Commit the added file to the `add-utils`branch. Use any text you want for the commit message.",
111
+
"Create a pull request that proposes to merge the`add-utils`branch into the`main` branch. Use any text you want for the pull request message.",
112
+
]}
113
+
/>
105
114
106
-
1. Commit the added file to the `add-utils` branch. Use any text you want for the commit message.
115
+
After a few moments, CodeRabbit responds to the pull request using the `@coderabbitai` GitHub account. It performs the following actions, all of which are visible on the pull request's page on GitHub:
107
116
108
-
1. Create a pull request that proposes to merge the `add-utils` branch into the `main` branch. Use any text you want for the pull request message.
117
+
<ListItems
118
+
items={[
119
+
"If you didn't write a pull request summary, then CodeRabbit adds a new summary to the pull request.",
120
+
"CodeRabbit posts a comment titled **Walkthrough** containing analysis and commentary about the content of the pull request.",
121
+
"CodeRabbit attaches a detailed code review to the pull request as another comment.",
109
122
110
-
After a few moments, CodeRabbit responds to the pull request using the `@coderabbitai` GitHub account. It performs the following actions, all of which are visible on the pull request's page on GitHub:
123
+
]}
111
124
112
-
- If you didn't write a pull request summary, then CodeRabbit adds a new summary to the pull request.
113
-
- CodeRabbit posts a comment titled **Walkthrough** containing analysis and commentary about the content of the pull request.
114
-
- CodeRabbit attaches a detailed code review to the pull request as another comment.
125
+
/>
115
126
116
127
Part of the review resembles the following screenshot:
117
128
@@ -131,13 +142,15 @@ After CodeRabbit reviews a pull request, you can converse with it about its revi
131
142
132
143
After a few moments, CodeRabbit posts its reply, explaining its motivations for its recommendation. The reply might resemble the following:
133
144
134
-
> You're right that these functions are quite self-explanatory from their names alone. Docstrings aren't strictly necessary for every function, especially in smaller projects with clear function names.
135
-
>
136
-
> While docstrings do provide benefits (IDE tooltips, documentation generation, help for future developers), they can sometimes feel redundant for very straightforward functions. It's ultimately a matter of coding style and project requirements.
137
-
>
138
-
> If you prefer to skip docstrings for obvious utility functions in this project, that's perfectly reasonable. Would you like me to adjust my review approach regarding documentation for this repository?
145
+
<ChatBubble>
146
+
{`> You're right that these functions are quite self-explanatory from their names alone. Docstrings aren't strictly necessary for every function, especially in smaller projects with clear function names.
147
+
>
148
+
> While docstrings do provide benefits (IDE tooltips, documentation generation, help for future developers), they can sometimes feel redundant for very straightforward functions. It's ultimately a matter of coding style and project requirements.
149
+
>
150
+
> If you prefer to skip docstrings for obvious utility functions in this project, that's perfectly reasonable. Would you like me to adjust my review approach regarding documentation for this repository?`}
151
+
</ChatBubble>
139
152
140
-
In this case, CodeRabbit is offering to adjust its future behavior when reviewing changes to this repository. Instead, follow the next step to ask CodeRabbit to implement part of its suggestions.
153
+
In this case, CodeRabbit is offering to adjust its future behavior when reviewing changes to this repository. Instead, follow the next step to ask CodeRabbit to implement part of its suggestions.
0 commit comments