|
1 | 1 | 🥥 🥝 🍌 🫐
|
2 | 2 |
|
3 |
| -This repo is for issues that: |
| 3 | +> [!CAUTION] |
| 4 | +> While this repo is named "internal" it is public to the world. Please do not |
| 5 | +> post customer names or any other sensitive business information. |
| 6 | +
|
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +This tracker is for issues that: |
4 | 9 |
|
5 | 10 | * Are not relevant to the community, e.g. deeply composed tasks
|
6 |
| -* Heavily discuss internal company processes such as Sprints and long term planning |
7 |
| -* Discuss named customers or other private information |
| 11 | +* Discuss internal company processes such as Sprints and long term planning |
8 | 12 | * Span multiple repos and have no clear primary repo
|
9 | 13 |
|
10 |
| -Please continue using public, project-specific repositories for as many |
11 |
| -issues as possible. Try to write issues in a way that engages users. |
| 14 | +Please continue using project-specific repositories for as many |
| 15 | +issues as possible. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +## coder/coder goals |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +`coder/coder` is for end-users to connect with Coder engineers and product managers. Our most important issues will always live there. Bugs/improvements for released features should always live there. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +Please write issues in `coder/coder` in a way that engages users. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +## rules of thumb |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +1. A public issue (even in this repo) should never link to a private resource such as a Notion page, Slack thread, etc. |
| 26 | + 1. Take screenshots of slack threads, publish notion pages, or simply copy |
| 27 | + relevant information into the issue. |
| 28 | +1. All issues, regardless of repository, should have a body. |
| 29 | +1. If you have an issue and think there's basically zero chance a user would react/comment on it, put it here. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +## this is weird |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +Most companies solve the problem of open source tracker bloat by moving |
| 34 | +a lot of core development activity into private trackers such as JIRA. We |
| 35 | +have opted for a different approach because: |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +* Sometimes it's hard to know where an issue should live, GitHub makes it easy to move issues between repositories |
| 38 | +* We want developers to be highly comfortable with GitHub as a tool |
| 39 | +* GitHub projects makes it easy to track issues across repositories, so we can |
| 40 | +avoid a painful syncing process between a public and internal tracker |
| 41 | +* If a community member begins engaging with the internal tracker, we can |
| 42 | +use it as a sign that that type of issue should be moved to coder/coder |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +# transfers |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +On some interval, @ammario and the PMs will move issues between here and the |
| 48 | +community. Please take this as a sign that the issue should've been originally |
| 49 | +created in a different place. |
0 commit comments