Skip to content

Pin rustc nightly to nightly-2025-07-18 for miri tests #5999

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 19, 2025

Conversation

ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh commented Jul 19, 2025

Closes #5998

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the CI workflow to use a specific Rust nightly toolchain version for improved stability during testing.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 19, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The CI workflow was updated to pin the Rust nightly toolchain for the "miri" job to a specific date-based version ("nightly-2025-07-18") due to a known Rust compiler issue. The previous use of the generic "nightly" tag was commented out, and a TODO comment references the upstream Rust issue.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yaml Pinned Rust nightly toolchain to "nightly-2025-07-18" for Miri job; added TODO and commented out prior "nightly" usage.

Poem

A bunny hops through YAML fields,
Pinning nightly Rust, so nothing yields.
With a TODO note and a careful paw,
Awaiting Rust to fix its flaw.
CI now runs, the tests all cheer—
Until the next nightly, the path is clear!
🐇✨
"""


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b1e4a7 and 95880ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2025 09:32
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (1)

360-364: Avoid hard-coding the nightly date twice – introduce a single env var

The date string nightly-2025-07-18 now appears both in the toolchain
input and in the cargo +... invocation. If the date ever changes it is
easy to miss one of the occurrences.

A minimal DRY tweak:

@@
-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@master
-        with:
-            toolchain: nightly-2025-07-18 # TODO: Set to "nightly" once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144168 is fixed
+      env:
+        RUST_NIGHTLY: nightly-2025-07-18  # TODO: revert to "nightly" once rust-lang/rust#144168 is fixed
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@master
+        with:
+          toolchain: ${{ env.RUST_NIGHTLY }}
@@
-        # run: MIRIFLAGS='-Zmiri-ignore-leaks' cargo +nightly miri test -p rustpython-vm -- miri_test
-        run: MIRIFLAGS='-Zmiri-ignore-leaks' cargo +nightly-2025-07-18 miri test -p rustpython-vm -- miri_test
+        # run: MIRIFLAGS='-Zmiri-ignore-leaks' cargo +nightly miri test -p rustpython-vm -- miri_test
+        run: MIRIFLAGS='-Zmiri-ignore-leaks' cargo +${{ env.RUST_NIGHTLY }} miri test -p rustpython-vm -- miri_test

One variable, zero drift.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd8e557 and 6b1e4a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ShaharNaveh
PR: RustPython/RustPython#5932
File: .github/workflows/comment-commands.yml:18-24
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T10:08:43.330Z
Learning: In GitHub Actions workflows for the RustPython project, the maintainer ShaharNaveh prefers to keep workflows simple and doesn't mind if steps fail when the desired state is already achieved (e.g., user already assigned to an issue). Avoid suggesting complex error handling for edge cases they don't consider problematic.
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (3)
Learnt from: ShaharNaveh
PR: RustPython/RustPython#5932
File: .github/workflows/comment-commands.yml:18-24
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T10:08:43.330Z
Learning: In GitHub Actions workflows for the RustPython project, the maintainer ShaharNaveh prefers to keep workflows simple and doesn't mind if steps fail when the desired state is already achieved (e.g., user already assigned to an issue). Avoid suggesting complex error handling for edge cases they don't consider problematic.
Learnt from: CR
PR: RustPython/RustPython#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T03:16:56.500Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Always run clippy to lint code (`cargo clippy`) before completing tasks. Fix any warnings or lints that are introduced by your changes
Learnt from: CR
PR: RustPython/RustPython#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T03:16:56.500Z
Learning: Applies to Lib/test/**/*.py : When tests fail due to unsupported syntax, keep the test as `@unittest.expectedFailure`, document that it requires PEP 695 support, and focus on tests that can be fixed through Rust code changes only
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests on wasm-wasi
  • GitHub Check: Check the WASM package and demo
  • GitHub Check: Run tests under miri
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Check Rust code with rustfmt and clippy
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Ensure compilation on various targets
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (1)

353-357: Pin the action version instead of relying on @master

dtolnay/rust-toolchain@master floats on every push to the action’s repo.
A sudden breaking change upstream could silently break CI even though the
toolchain itself is pinned.

-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@master
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@v1   # or a specific commit SHA

Pinning the action (not just the Rust toolchain) keeps the workflow fully
reproducible.
[ suggest_optional_refactor ]

@youknowone youknowone merged commit da5a44e into RustPython:main Jul 19, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI fails to run tests under miri due to rustc issue
2 participants