Skip to content

Fix set___name__ and set___qualname__ deadlock #5956

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2025

Conversation

youknowone
Copy link
Member

@youknowone youknowone commented Jul 12, 2025

close #5940 by different approach

cc @ShaharNaveh

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the way type names are updated internally to enhance reliability and consistency. No changes to user-facing behavior.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 12, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the implementation of the set___qualname__ and set___name__ methods in the PyType struct. Instead of directly overwriting the qualname and name fields under a write lock, the code now uses std::mem::replace to swap values, ensuring the old value is dropped after releasing the lock.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
vm/src/builtins/type.rs Refactored set___qualname__ and set___name__ to use std::mem::replace for field updates, ensuring old values are dropped after lock release. No signature changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant PyType
    participant Lock

    User->>PyType: set___name__(new_value)
    PyType->>Lock: acquire write lock
    PyType->>Lock: replace name with new_value (mem::replace)
    Lock-->>PyType: release lock
    PyType->>User: return result
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #) Addressed Explanation
Improved handling when setting the __name__ attribute of types to ensure proper internal updates and consistency (#5940)

Poem

A rabbit hopped to type-land’s den,
Swapped names with care, then swapped again.
With mem::replace the lock was freed,
No evil hangs or buggy deed.
The fields now change without a fuss—
Type rabbits cheer, “No deadlocks for us!”
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac20b00 and 746f7a3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Lib/test/test_descr.py is excluded by !Lib/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • vm/src/builtins/type.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • .github/copilot-instructions.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests on wasm-wasi
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Check the WASM package and demo
  • GitHub Check: Run tests under miri
  • GitHub Check: Check Rust code with rustfmt and clippy
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run rust tests (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Ensure compilation on various targets
🔇 Additional comments (2)
vm/src/builtins/type.rs (2)

683-691: Excellent deadlock fix implementation!

The use of std::mem::replace with proper scoping correctly addresses the deadlock issue. This pattern ensures the write lock is released before the old value's destructor runs, preventing potential deadlocks during Python object cleanup.

The implementation mirrors CPython's Py_SETREF semantics and is well-documented.


848-854: Consistent and correct deadlock fix implementation.

This follows the same safe pattern as the set___qualname__ method, using std::mem::replace to ensure the lock is released before destructors run. The comment correctly references CPython's Py_SETREF pattern.

Both implementations are consistent and should resolve the deadlock issue mentioned in the PR.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@youknowone youknowone merged commit e21ec55 into RustPython:main Jul 12, 2025
12 checks passed
@youknowone youknowone deleted the fix-name-deadlock branch July 12, 2025 15:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant